<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fixed and prime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:38:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johann</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/comment-page-1/#comment-7964</link>
		<dc:creator>Johann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/#comment-7964</guid>
		<description>Very nice, glad to see what the 50 can do, and so cheap!

I haven&#039;t been doing my blog thing lately, so I&#039;m behind the times getting to this news. Mine was offered up in sacrifice, and I&#039;ve been thinking of going the black and white film route.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice, glad to see what the 50 can do, and so cheap!</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t been doing my blog thing lately, so I&#8217;m behind the times getting to this news. Mine was offered up in sacrifice, and I&#8217;ve been thinking of going the black and white film route.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/comment-page-1/#comment-7954</link>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/#comment-7954</guid>
		<description>yeah yeah yeah- all that technical stuff is fine and I can&#039;t wait to see what you do with your  lense, BUT can we talk about houw cute Bethany&#039;s hair is? WOW!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah yeah yeah- all that technical stuff is fine and I can&#8217;t wait to see what you do with your  lense, BUT can we talk about houw cute Bethany&#8217;s hair is? WOW!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/comment-page-1/#comment-7945</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 11:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/#comment-7945</guid>
		<description>Thanks!  Fortunately it is not the technical info that makes good pictures.  I normally try to avoid the geeky info aspect of this mostly intuitive endeavor, but I find that understanding how it operates makes it easier to employ that intuition.  I did have to refresh my own memory in order to understand why the lens was better for some things, how f-stops/aperture size works, and why it effects the depth of field.  I did not even know what bokeh was when I started seeing it in reviews and discussions.  I may forget it all again in a few years when it is not a part of my regular life, and will have to look it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  Fortunately it is not the technical info that makes good pictures.  I normally try to avoid the geeky info aspect of this mostly intuitive endeavor, but I find that understanding how it operates makes it easier to employ that intuition.  I did have to refresh my own memory in order to understand why the lens was better for some things, how f-stops/aperture size works, and why it effects the depth of field.  I did not even know what bokeh was when I started seeing it in reviews and discussions.  I may forget it all again in a few years when it is not a part of my regular life, and will have to look it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grandma</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/comment-page-1/#comment-7943</link>
		<dc:creator>Grandma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 04:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/#comment-7943</guid>
		<description>What greaat pictures! Remindes me of the days when I knew more about that stuff.So glad you and Nathan are so good at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What greaat pictures! Remindes me of the days when I knew more about that stuff.So glad you and Nathan are so good at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShackelMom</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/comment-page-1/#comment-7942</link>
		<dc:creator>ShackelMom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/#comment-7942</guid>
		<description>I know next to nothing about cameras and lenses, but the pictures you took were great! I really like the natural lighting (and the subjects).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know next to nothing about cameras and lenses, but the pictures you took were great! I really like the natural lighting (and the subjects).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/comment-page-1/#comment-7938</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/#comment-7938</guid>
		<description>I was watching an auction that had a camera with a 50mm lens included that was described as ranging in aperture from 1.4 to 22.  I watched it until the end, but there must have been others with the same plan.  It shot from $31 to over $90 in the last minute or two.  It is not unusual for a 50mm 1.4 fixed lens to go for $200+.

This lens does open up the dark days to the eye of my camera more.  I like that.

I might do a comparison...  That could prove rather interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was watching an auction that had a camera with a 50mm lens included that was described as ranging in aperture from 1.4 to 22.  I watched it until the end, but there must have been others with the same plan.  It shot from $31 to over $90 in the last minute or two.  It is not unusual for a 50mm 1.4 fixed lens to go for $200+.</p>
<p>This lens does open up the dark days to the eye of my camera more.  I like that.</p>
<p>I might do a comparison&#8230;  That could prove rather interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan (brother)</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/comment-page-1/#comment-7937</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan (brother)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/#comment-7937</guid>
		<description>The fixed lens is the way to go for the most light capture and best optics. I am surprised that you found it so cheap. Could you have gone 1.2 for $60? Haha. Nice shots. It really does seem like a film camera in those low light shots, or maybe better?

Those variable focal length (kit) lenses always seem like a convenient solution, but they are never as good as a single job. Hey how about taking the same shot with both lenses at the same focal length and comparing. Let the minimum aperture take it&#039;s toll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fixed lens is the way to go for the most light capture and best optics. I am surprised that you found it so cheap. Could you have gone 1.2 for $60? Haha. Nice shots. It really does seem like a film camera in those low light shots, or maybe better?</p>
<p>Those variable focal length (kit) lenses always seem like a convenient solution, but they are never as good as a single job. Hey how about taking the same shot with both lenses at the same focal length and comparing. Let the minimum aperture take it&#8217;s toll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Von Fange</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/comment-page-1/#comment-7936</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Von Fange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 17:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech-samaritan.org/blog/2007/04/06/fixed-and-prime/#comment-7936</guid>
		<description>Great choice. I love my Canon 50mm f1.8. Being able to gather that much like does open up so many more places to shoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great choice. I love my Canon 50mm f1.8. Being able to gather that much like does open up so many more places to shoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
